[This article is cross-posted on PlanetarianPerspectives.net ]Mired in multiple federal, state and local, investigations and evidence-based alligations of major corruption, ex parte communications, and backroom dealings between Commission officials and the executives of the monopoly utilities they are supposed to be regulating, the CPUC has circled the wagons and hired a top-of-the-line million dollar law firm to defend it against advocates of the public interest. In the center of this controversy are law partners Maria (Mia) Severson and Mike Aguirre – both of them former San Diego City Attorneys. Representing a ratepayer client, the Severson-Aguirre team has waged a relentless legal battle which has helped expose the utter dysfunctionality and corruption of California’s current energy regulatory regime. Their work, along with organizations like the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, EMR Safety Network, and Friends of the Earth (FoE), has helped force the release of a spate of e-mails revealing a deep systemic pattern of collusion and corruption between utility executives and Commission officials and staff, consistently aligned against the public interest. The massive e-mail releases – not yet fully analyzed by researchers and investigators – call into serious question the legality and validity of all the recent rulings of the CPUC, including those relating to San Onofre, Diablo Canyon and the deployment of electro-toxic, wireless, privacy-violating, so-called ‘smart meters.’ The illegal attempt to foist the bulk of the costs of the Southern California Edison/Mitsubishi steam-generator screw-up at the now permanently shut down San Onofre nuclear plant on ratepayers – detailed in this exclusive EON interview with attorney Mia Severson – is only the tip of the CPUC corruption ice berg. Stay tuned… On background, here is our 2014 interview with Mike Aguirre: Check out the preview of EON’s forthcoming documentary SHUTDOWN at ShutdownDoc.TV =========== If you like EON’s work, you can support it, whatever your budget level, here.
Federal ruling calls future of Diablo Canyon reactors into questionFriends of the Earth: Decision is beginning of the end for troubled nuclear plant Contacts: Damon Moglen, Friends of the Earth: (202) 352-4223, firstname.lastname@example.org David Freeman, (310) 902-2147, email@example.com Bill Walker, (510) 759-9911, firstname.lastname@example.org WASHINGTON – In a major victory that could mark the beginning of the end for the Diablo Canyon nuclear reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissioners have ruled that an Atomic Safety Licensing Board will decide whether Pacific Gas & Electric Co. was allowed to illegally alter the plant’s license in an attempt to hide the risk from powerful earthquake faults discovered since it was designed and built. The Commission’s referral of the issue to the licensing board parallels a move that presaged the shutdown of Southern California Edison’s San Onofre nuclear plant two years ago. “This is a major victory that could be the turning point for a nuclear-free future for California,” said Damon Moglen of Friends of the Earth, which had petitioned the NRC saying that the secret amendment of the license was an illegal maneuver designed to avoid holding a public hearing on the issue as required by federal law. “PG&E now knows that it is on the same path that forced Southern California Edison to pull the plug on San Onofre.” In a 3 -1 ruling released today, commissioners ruled that Friends of the Earth’s petition will now be considered by an expert panel of the licensing board. Friends of the Earth had alleged that PG&E is operating the 1960-era nuclear reactors at Diablo Canyon in violation of their license and called for the reactors to be closed immediately pending public hearings to prove it is safe. The Commission did not rule on closing the reactors pending public hearings, but ruled that the safety issues should now be considered by the Commission’s executive director for operations. Today’s decision is all but identical to that the Commission in November 2012 in response to a similar petition from Friends of the Earth regarding to the damaged nuclear reactors at San Onofre. In that case, the licensing board ruled in in May 2013 that public hearings should be held as part of a formal license amendment proceeding to assess the safety of San Onofre.. When Edison announced the closure of San Onofre a few weeks later, they referred to the ASLB decision. “This decision is indeed the beginning of the end for Diablo Canyon,” said Dave Freeman, former head of the federal Tennessee Valley Authority, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. “PG&E is not going to get away with running Diablo Canyon when the plant can not withstand the ground motion from the earthquake faults we now know surround these reactors,” said Freeman, a special advisor to Friends of the Earth. The ruling comes days after the NRC sent PG&E a letter requiring the utility to conduct further studies to show whether Diablo Canyon – California’s last nuclear plant, on the Pacific coast near San Luis Obispo – is operating within the bounds of its license. Diablo Canyon was one of only two U.S. reactors required to conduct further seismic risk evaluation because its license does not account for newly discovered hazards. ================= Related: Paul Frey calls our attention to this – Super Shear Earthquakes – Deadlier Than Deadly
MOTHERS FOR PEACE TELLS NRC
ENERGY NEEDS CAN BE MET WITHOUT RE-LICENSING DIABLO CANYONGROUP ACCUSES PG&E OF FAILING TO ADMIT THAT RENEWABLES ARE PLENTIFUL AND MUCH SAFER THAN EXTENDED DIABLO CANYON OPERATION COULD EVER BE
NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release Contacts: Jane Swanson email@example.com (805) 440-1359 Linda Seeley firstname.lastname@example.org 805) 234-1769
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace P.O. Box 3608 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 mothersforpeace.orgIn two new contentions filed on April 6 before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP) charged that Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) had skewed a new analysis of energy alternatives to ignore or reject a wide range of renewable energy options available to replace the power generated by Diablo Canyon. SLOMFP contends that NRC has no justification for renewing PG&E’s license in light of the wide availability of renewables that are cheaper and safer than running Diablo Canyon another 20 years. The two Contentions, filed by SLOMFP attorney Diane Curran of Washington, D.C. challenge the Adequacy of PG&E’s Environmental Report for Diablo Canyon License Renewal. SLOMFP asserts that PG&E’s Amended Environmental Report, submitted in March of 2015, fails to meet the requirements of federal law because it does not evaluate many of the energy alternatives that currently are commercially viable or will become so by the time the current Diablo Canyon operating licenses for two reactors expire in 2024 and 2025. PG&E also fails to take into account the dramatic reduction in cost of renewable technologies and efficiency improvements in recent years. It also fails to acknowledge the deteriorating economics of aging reactors. SLOMFP also criticized PG&E for understating the environmental impacts of renewing the Diablo Canyon license. “PG&E already has generated tons of highly radioactive spent fuel for which no repository exists and therefore must be stored onsite indefinitely,” said Diane Curran, attorney for SLOMFP. She noted that “as a result, the Diablo Canyon fuel storage pools are filled to capacity with spent fuel. The NRC has admitted pools are vulnerable to catastrophic fire if the spent fuel assemblies are not covered with water for any length of time.” Linda Seeley, spokeswoman for SLOMFP, added that “PG&E should go back to the drawing board and provide an up-to-date comparison of the costs and environmental risks of continuing to operate Diablo Canyon versus adopting renewables and demand and supply management.” She called Diablo Canyon a “dangerous dinosaur” that should be retired. SLOMFP’s Contentions are supported by expert witness Mark Cooper, Senior Fellow for Economic Analysis at the Institute for Energy and the Environment at Vermont Law School. Mark Cooper is an expert in the field of economic and policy analysis with a focus on energy, technology, and communications issues. SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE’S MOTION TO FILE NEW CONTENTIONS REGARDING ADEQUACY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT FOR DIABLO CANYON LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION is available at https://mothersforpeace.org/data/2015/2015-04-07-mothers-for-peace-tells-nrc-that-energy-needs-can-be-met-without-re-licensing-diablo-canyon To view the CV and Expert Testimony of Mark Cooper, email email@example.com and request that it be sent at pdf. The documents will be sent as three separate pdf’s as they are too large to transmit in one email.
BACKGROUND:San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP) opposes PG&E’s application for 20-year operating license extensions for Diablo Canyon units 1 and 2. The current operating licenses are in effect until 2024 and 2025, and in November of 2009 PG&E filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) an application to extend operations until 2044 and 2045. The Diablo Canyon facility includes two nuclear reactors and the storage of all the high-level radioactive wastes generated by those reactors since 1984. Currently, most of the used fuel (which is more radioactive than the fuel in the reactors) is stored in over-crowded pools. Approximately a third of the spent fuel has been transferred to dry casks. SLOMFP filed a seismic contention in opposition to license renewal in early 2010. The substance of that legal challenge is that “PG&E’s Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) analysis fails to consider information regarding the Shoreline fault that is necessary for an understanding of seismic risks to the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. As a result, PG&E’sSAMA analysis does not satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act [(NEPA)] for consideration of alternatives or NRC implementing regulation 10 C.F.R. § 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(L).” This seismic challenge was put on hold for several years while PG&E completed seismic studies required by the NRC. The NRC has indicated that evidentiary hearings on SLOMFP’s seismic contention will be scheduled at some time in 2016.
Interestingly damaged article on Diablo. I thought I’d make a comment, but I’m being told that I can’t make one as I’m not authorized to do so by their system… Yep tried multiple times, but I get the following error when attempting to submit the below comment, which I waited five minutes and tried again. Also going over to twitter and was able to tweet etc. …Here’s what I put together in about 3-4 minutes that you won’t see! As archivist for the group that did blockades (note the plural) at the facility between 1977 through 1985, it should be noted that this piece is nice but clearly flawed in many ways. To begin with the slideshow says “hundreds” of arrests. Wrong. Actual number is just under 2,000 for the Ten day blockade in 1981. This piece also fails to delve into just how large the opposition of those reactors was back in the day, and to what extent pro-nuclear forces had to get its way. From the Supreme Court case that resulted in leaked NRC transcripts to the Chron’s former TV station showing that the agency broke its own laws in allowing the facility to open, to the CPUC’s own $7 million investigation that was also scrapped in 1984 when the Brown Administration termed out. The republican controlled deal in 1988 resulted in the largest rate increase in Cal history, which in turn set off a revolt by large customers. That in turn led to Governor Wilson’s 1996 deregulation scam that gave $28 billion to PG&E & the owners of San Onofre that was then followed by 2001 Enron theft of billions. And of course, rather than let Gray Davis’ lawsuit over the theft happen, he was recalled. A minor problem of historic amnesia here by the media, all of which was organized to protect PG&E.Frank Egger – who, as mayor of Fairfax, CA., became the longest serving elected official in state history – was also a member of the California Coastal Commission back in the day 40 years ago when Diablo was still only a radioactive gleam in Pg&E’s evil eye. Here’s what he recalls in a recent e-mail comment:
Today’s Chronicle has a story on Diablo Canyon but their facts may be wrong. They say Feds approved construction of the 1st reactor in 1968 before they knew of the fault lines. They talk about Hosgri’s fault being discovered in 1971. Prop 20 was approved by voters in Nov, 1972 and Diablo Canyon did not have a coastal permit to start construction. [Prop. 20 established the Coastal Commission and established regulations for coastal areas. PDF here.] I remember it being on a North Central Coast Regional Commission agenda in 1973 for direction to give to the NCCC rep on the State Commission. I tried in vain to stop it. We, the Coastal Commission, knew about the earthquake faults and the danger of locating it on the coast. A split vote gave Commissioner Bob Mendelsohn (then also a SF supervisor) the green light for a yes vote. Frank Egger (I was mayor of Fairfax) was on the no side and Phyllis Faber on the yes side. I attended the State Coastal Commission meeting in South San Francisco (I’m thinking late 1973 early 1974) )and during the break I was on stage trying to get State Commissioner Richard Wilson, Ronald Reagan’s appointee, to vote no on Diablo Canyon. the Coastal Commission knew about the fault lines when they approved Diablo Canyon. [emphasis added]Many thanks to Roger and Frank. As the current Decommission Diablo movement gathers momentum, its great to have the human resource of personal recollections like these to help us be conscious of and honor the movement’s historic roots.